Russia Blames U.S. for Nord Stream Pipeline Attacks. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has asserted that it is “clear” the United States ordered the attacks on the Nord Stream pipelines. His statement marks a significant escalation in the ongoing dispute over the explosions that damaged the pipelines last year.
In a press briefing on Monday, Lavrov claimed that recent intelligence and investigations strongly indicate U.S. involvement in the attacks. He suggested that these findings are based on new evidence and intelligence reports, though he did not provide specific details. Lavrov’s comments add fuel to existing tensions between Moscow and Washington over the incident.
The Nord Stream pipelines, which transport natural gas from Russia to Europe, suffered major explosions in September 2023. The attacks disrupted gas supplies and led to significant economic and environmental impacts. International investigators have been examining the incident, but no definitive conclusions have emerged yet regarding the perpetrators.
The U.S. government has strongly denied any involvement in the Nord Stream attacks. Officials in Washington call Lavrov’s claims baseless and argue that they lack evidence. They emphasize that the U.S. has no interest in destabilizing European energy supplies and instead focuses on supporting allies and ensuring energy security.
The allegations come amid rising geopolitical tensions between Russia and the West. The Nord Stream incident has further strained relations, with both sides exchanging accusations. Russia has criticized Western nations for their handling of the investigation, while the U.S. and its allies have called for a transparent and unbiased inquiry.
International reactions to Lavrov’s claims are mixed. Some analysts suggest that the statements might be aimed at deflecting criticism from Russia or creating a diversion. Others fear that such accusations could exacerbate existing conflicts and further complicate diplomatic relations.
As investigations into the Nord Stream attacks continue, the international community awaits more conclusive evidence. The incident remains a contentious issue in global politics, with ongoing debates about its causes and implications for energy security and geopolitical stability.
